Advanced Traffic Stops

Are you looking to elevate your officers’ legal knowledge and protect your department from costly lawsuits? Look no further than our Advanced Traffic Stops course. This comprehensive training program is designed to empower law enforcement professionals with the skills and knowledge needed to conduct proactive and legally defensible traffic stops. By investing in Blue to Gold, you are investing in the safety and success of your officers and your department.

In our fast-paced instruction, we use real-world case law to delve into the legal aspects of searches and seizures in federal and state-specific jurisdictions, with a specific focus on traffic stops. Our goal is to provide officers with a deeper understanding of important case law related to traffic stops, emphasizing the significance of consent, exceptions, and warrants in any search or seizure. We equip your officers with the tools they need to make confident, informed decisions on the job.

By completing our Advanced Traffic Stops course, your officers will:

– Gain a thorough understanding of important case law related to traffic stops, ensuring they are up-to-date with the latest legal standards and requirements.

– Learn about the rules surrounding the six most common motor vehicle searches, enabling them to navigate these situations effectively and lawfully.

– Reduce or eliminate the risk of lawsuits by conducting traffic stops in a professional and legally defensible manner.

– Establish good case law, setting a solid foundation for successful prosecutions and protecting the integrity of your department.

Our training modules cover a wide range of crucial topics, including the history of the motor vehicle exception, the Jones decision, pretext stops under Whren, the scope of a traffic stop, involuntary transportation, questioning occupants, gaining lawful consent to search, and the legal considerations surrounding warrantless vehicle searches, including protective sweeps, searches incident to arrest, inventories, K9 sniffs, and probable cause searches.

At Blue to Gold, our training is high-energy, interactive, and engaging. We understand the importance of keeping officers motivated and actively involved in the learning process. Upon completion of the course, all students will receive a completion certificate and our Search & Seizure Survival Guide, serving as a valuable reference for future use.

Don’t miss this opportunity to empower yourself and your colleagues with the skills and knowledge needed to navigate the legal complexities of traffic stops with confidence.

Join us for our Advanced Traffic Stops course and ensure your officers are equipped to handle any situation that arises on the road. Invest in their professional development and the success of your department.

POST APPROVALS

AL
In-Person, Live Stream
AK
In-Person, Live Stream
AZ
In-Person, Live Stream, On Demand
AR
In-Person, Live Stream, On Demand
CA
In-Person
CO
In-Person
CT
In-Person, Live Stream
DE
FL
In-Person, Live Stream, On Demand
GA
In-Person
HI
ID
In-Person, Live Stream
IL
In-Person
IN
In-Person, Live Stream
IA
In-Person
KS
In-Person, Live Stream
KY
In-Person
LA
In-Person
ME
In-Person, Live Stream
MD
In-Person
MA
MI
In-Person, Live Stream
MN
In-Person, Live Stream, On Demand
MS
In-Person, Live Stream
MO
In-Person, Live Stream
MT
In-Person, Live Stream
NE
In-Person, Live Stream, On Demand
NV
In-Person, Live Stream
NH
In-Person, Live Stream, On Demand
NJ
In-Person
NM
In-Person, Live Stream
NY
In-Person
NC
In-Person, Live Stream, On Demand
ND
In-Person, Live Stream, On Demand
OH
In-Person
OK
In-Person, Live Stream, On Demand
OR
In-Person
PA
In-Person
RI
In-Person
SC
In-Person, Live Stream
SD
In-Person, Live Stream
TN
In-Person
TX
In-Person
UT
In-Person
VT
In-Person
VA
In-Person
WA
In-Person, Live Stream
WV
In-Person
WI
In-Person, Live Stream
WY
In-Person, Live Stream, On Demand
  • Hover on State to see POST Approval for this Course
  • Click onย  ‘POST APPROVAL DETAILS’ below to see complete Approval list.ย 
  • Post Approval Details
STATE POST APPROVAL
ALABAMA
In-Person, Live Stream
ALASKA
In-Person, Live Stream
ARIZONA
In-Person, Live Stream, On Demand
ARKANSAS
In-Person, Live Stream, On Demand
CALIFORNIA
In-Person
COLORADO
In-Person
CONNECTICUT
In-Person, Live Stream
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
In-Person, Live Stream, On Demand
GEORGIA
In-Person
HAWAII
IDAHO
In-Person, Live Stream
ILLINOIS
In-Person
INDIANA
In-Person, Live Stream
IOWA
In-Person
KANSAS
In-Person, Live Stream
KENTUCKY
In-Person
LOUISANA
In-Person
MAINE
In-Person, Live Stream
MARYLAND
In-Person
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
In-Person, Live Stream
MINNESOTA
In-Person, Live Stream, On Demand
MISSISSIPPI
In-Person, Live Stream
MISSOURI
In-Person, Live Stream
MONTANA
In-Person, Live Stream
NEVADA
In-Person, Live Stream
NEBRASKA
In-Person, Live Stream, On Demand
NEW HAMPSHIRE
In-Person, Live Stream, On Demand
NEW JERSEY
In-Person
NEW MEXICO
In-Person, Live Stream
NEW YORK
In-Person
NORTH CAROLINA
In-Person, Live Stream, On Demand
NORTH DAKOTA
In-Person, Live Stream, On Demand
OHIO
In-Person
OKLAHOMA
In-Person, Live Stream, On Demand
OREGON
In-Person
PENNSYLVANIA
In-Person
RHODE ISLAND
In-Person
SOUTH CAROLINA
In-Person, Live Stream
SOUTH DAKOTA
In-Person, Live Stream
TENNESSEE
In-Person
TEXAS
In-Person
UTAH
In-Person
VERMONT
In-Person
VIRGINIA
In-Person
WASHINGTON
In-Person, Live Stream
WEST VIRGINIA
In-Person
WISCONSIN
In-Person, Live Stream
WYOMING
In-Person, Live Stream, On Demand

Course Introduction

  1. Instructor introduction.
  2. Iโ€™m going to help you become more proficient in the constitutional law most applicable to traffic stops.
  3. Explain the course objective.
    1. Recognize how the Fourth Amendment applies to each situation.
    2. Demonstrate the understanding of reasonable suspicion and how toapply that to traffic stops.
    3. Demonstrating an understanding of actions than can and cannot betaken with vehicle occupants.
    4. Translate the Fourth Amendment to make good case law.
  4. Encourage attendees to ask questions and share feedback with other attendees.
  5. Explain that certificates will be emailed after the class and each student will be registered in the Blue to Gold University.
  6. Go over the three disclaimers:
    1. Laws and agency standard operating procedures may be more restrictive. Blue to Gold teaching the federal standard unless otherwise stated. Therefore, students must know their state and local requirements in addition to the federal standard.
    2. If students have any doubts about their actions, ask a supervisor or legal advisor.
    3. The course is not legal advice, but legal education. Therefore, nothing we teach should be interpreted as legal advice. Check with your agencyโ€™s legal advisor for legal advice.

Preface

1. The Three Golden Rules of Search & Seizure

  1. Rule #1: The more you articulate why you did something, the more likely it will be upheld in court.
  2. Rule #2: The more serious the crime, the more reasonable your actions are likely to be viewed.
  3. Rule #3: Conduct all warrantless searches and seizures in the same manner as if you had judicial pre-approval.

Module One โ€“ Major Cases

1. 1925 Carroll v. US
2. 1970 Chambers v. Maroney
3. Why Courts Allow So Many Warrantless Vehicle Searches

a. Vehicles can take off before search warrant is obtained.
b. Vehicles are highly regulated and that means less privacy. c. Roadside searches are often better for suspects.
d. Judges wouldnโ€™t get any sleep if warrants were required.

4. 1973 Cady v. Dombrowski
5. 1976 S. Dakota v. Opperman 6. 1985 California v. Carney
7. 2012 US v. Jones

Module Two โ€“ Every search and seizure requires C.R.E.W.

1. C.R.E.W Stands for Consent, Recognized Exception, and Warrant

2. Example: US v. Richmond โ€“ The Wobbling Tire

3. Example: State v. Speights

4. Example: Taylor v. City of Saginaw

Module Three โ€“ Pretext Stops

1. Courts look at objective facts.
2. Example: Whren v. US
3. Watch the Video: Pretext Traffic Stops

Module 4 โ€“ Scope of a Traffic Stop

1. Questioning Occupants

2. Prolonging the Stop

a. Example: Rodriguez v. US
b. Example: Arizona v. Johnson
c. Pro Tip โ€“ Rodriguez is all about time not topic.

  1. Best Practice: Permitted โ€“ Routine questions rapport/de-escalation travel plans โ€œbreadcrumbs.โ€ Requires R.S. โ€“ Intrusive questions, unrelated crimes, hunches and accusations.
  2. Checking license stats, warrants against driver, and inspecting paperwork are all related to stop.
    1. Example: U.S. v. Campbell
    2. Example: U.S. v. Holt
    3. Per U.S. v. Mason
    4. Example: State v. Smith
    5. Asking generally if illegal items are in the vehicle relates to highwaysafety.
    6. Watch the Video: Obstructed View and Unrelated Questions
    7. Example: Driver was stopped for faulty blinker.
    8. Watch the Video: Unrelated Drug Questions
  3. Completed Unrelated Questions May Occur With:

a. Consent

b. Unavoidable Downtime

c. Multi-tasking

d. Backup Officer

e. Per People v. White

Module Five – Passengers

  1. Identifying Passengers
  2. Controlling Passengers

a. Example: Brendlin v. California

b. Example: Arizona v. Johnson

c. Example: Maryland v. Wilson

  1. Legal Rule
  2. Best Practice

Module Six – Consent to Search

1. Why Suspects Consent to Search

a. Can explain away evidence

b. Hope evidence wonโ€™t be found

c. Appear cooperative

d. Consent is consistent with innocence

e. May feel discovery is inevitable

2. Free and Voluntary Consent

3. Facts to Consider

a. Threats or Misinterpretations

b. Show of Force

c. Allowing Person to Watch

d. Advising He Can Deny Consent

e. Level of Intrusion

4. Common Authority

a. Legal Rule

b. Pro Tip

c. The โ€œPiggyback Ruleโ€

d. Examples

5. Donโ€™t Exceed Scope

a. Legal Rule

b. Pro Tip

c. Example: US v. Gregoire

6. Your Words Matter

  1. Search
  2. Example: People v. Cantor
  3. Example: US v. Elliott
  4. Consent is automatically withdrawn when you ask to search for aparticular thing which is found.
  5. A destructive search requires explicit permission.
  6. Example: US v. Osage
  7. Examples
  8. Examples

Module Seven โ€“ Community Caretaking

1. Community caretaking encounters are not criminal investigations.

2. Example: State v. Cryan

3. Example: State v. Elders

4. Example: State v. Martinez

5. Example: Comm. V. Livingstone

6. What would you articulate?

a. Example: Comm. V. Robertson

Module Eight – Warrantless Searches

1. Six Warrantless Searches

a. Weapons

i. Pro Tip

ii. Three Justifications

iii. Example: State v. Chang

iv. Watch the Video: Driver Grabs Another Gun from Car

v. Factors to Consider

vi. Example: US v. Arnold vii. Often Up held Patdowns

viii. Watch the Video: Officer Conducts Illegal Patdown

b. Search Incident to Arrest

i. Example: Arizona v. Gant

ii. Example: People v. Sims

c. Evidence Related Search

i. You arrest a driver for a DUI, can you search car for evidence?

ii. Watch video:โ€œTraffic Stop: Warrantโ€

iii. Example: U.S. v. Reedy

d. Inventory Searches

i. Pro Tip

ii. Example: U.S. v. Del Rosario

iii. Pro Tip

iv. Red Flagsโ€“Courts keep an eye out for the following:

  • ย  No community caretaking rationale articulated.
  • ย Tow called after โ€œthoroughโ€ inventory conducted.
  • ย Tow not typically called for same situations.
  • ย Area searched not typical.
  • Policy not followed.

v. Example: Com. v. Landamus

vi. Example: Blakes v. Superior Court

vii. Ask the class

viii. Watch the Video: Goodbye, My Love

e. K9 Searches

i. Example: US v. Ludwig

ii. Example: US v. Cornejo iii. Example: US v. Hawley iv. Example: State v. Linze

v. Watch the video: Loitering Call vi. Example: US v. Thomas

vii. What if the dog touches the vehicle without handler direction?

viii. Watch the Video: Florida Traffic Stop With Free Air Sniff

ix. Takeaway: Instinctual touching is also problematic under Jones.

x. Example: State v. Howard xi. Example: State v. Dorff

f. PC Search

  1. Step One: Probable Cause
  2. The most powerful word in a police report is the word,โ€œbecause.โ€
  3. Step Two- Not Within Curtilage
  4. Apparently Mobile
  5. Disabled Vehicles
  6. Legal Rule: you conduct the search in the same manner as if you had a warrant.
  7. Example: US v. Ross
  8. Watch video: Traffic Stop, PC Search
  9. Watch video: Letโ€™s Put it All Together

g. Passengers

i. Example: US v. Di Re

ii. Pro Tip: Warrantless searches of passengers require a nexus between contraband and passenger.

iii. Example: State v. Wallace

iv. Example

v. Pro Tip: Remember, you need a nexus!

vi. Example: Jordan v. State

vii. Show the class the Dashcam Video

i. Nexus Factors:

  • ย  Where did dog alert?
  • ย  Guilty-mind Evidence
  • ย  Description and Nervousness
  • ย  Prior History
  • ย  Plain View Observations

ย 

Write a Review!

Current reviews for Advanced Traffic Stops

28 Reviews

5

R Nikephoros

Excellent course with thought-provoking and educational examples. Both entertaining and informative.

5

Nicholas Ingersoll

Great course! It was a good refresher and reminds me to keep things legit for the best stops!

5

Timothy Dunn

This is a great course which will help any officer make great cases while using these search techniques without violating anyones rights.

5

Amanda Williams

This is an amazing class and has a lot of great information!

5

Tamiko Paulk

Very informative course! It gave me more insight and useful information.

5

Carlos Valladares

Very insightful.

5

Colby Green

Advanced Traffic Stops helped me, as a 4 year LEO, feel more comfortable with 4th Amendment questions while on a traffic stop. Thank you!

5

Jesse Feazell

Much appreciated! You all do a fantastic work and service for the law enforcement community. I wish you were around when I was a rookie. Keep it up. Thank you for laying out your teachings in such an understanding way. Love your commitment to our LEO community!

5

Colin Rogers

This course does a great job on expanding basic knowledge on traffic stop legality. Great breakdown of legal points involving traffic stops. The case law associated with each module is a great touch.

5

Blake E Hollins

I'm a new supervisor and after taking this course, I feel more prepared to mead my officers

5

Jaen Rocha Garcia

I enjoyed going through this course and gained new insights on traffic stops based of case laws that were mentioned throughout the course. I liked the video examples used and how they were broken down to relate to this course.

5

RF

Texas

The class was great

5

AO

TXDPS

Very good class

5

BH

THP
Tx

Great class, extremely useful for the job!

5

Brandon

Texas

Great information. Wonderful class.

5

K. W.

Indiana

The Advanced Traffic Stops class was awesome and the instructor was engaging. He made the class very enjoyable and informational.

5
Indiana

I took the Advanced Traffic stops course. This course was helpful in explaining case law. That course was a detailed refresher.

5

MM

Ohio

Very informative, helped me understand how to improve my traffic stops

5

W.G.

Ohio

Great class! Learned a lot about the 4th amendment.

5

E.P.

Fairfield
Oh

Great training - A lot of case law that I learned new things about & case law I had never read before

5

AC

Wilmington PD

Advanced Search as well as traffic stops was excellent. Zaki was a great instructor and very intelligent. He answered any and all of my questions before and after class. Thanks Zaki!!

5

Mark Beluscak

Arapahoe Community College Law Enforcement Academy
Colorado

Advanced traffic stops class, another amazing class, great case studies.

5
Colorado

I enjoyed the class. The use of Colorado specific cases was very appreciated.

5

Rick Stead

Follansbee PD
West Virginia

Great class. Great instructor.

5
Texas

Good presentation and good content. The case law aspect was the most beneficial.

5
Texas

Very interesting subject matter and it is always good to refresh your knowledge of it. Very informative class and the instructor is very knowledgeable and entertaining.

5

G. A.

Kansas Highway Patrol
KS

Fantastic information. Presented in an informative and educational way. Learned a lot! Especially how embarrassingly wrong our agency had been teaching previously, with regard to consensual encounters.

5

G. R.

KHP
Texas

I appreciate the law enforcement way of explaining the material and not in a complicated legal terms or an attorney โ€˜s definition

All Students receive

Certificate of Completion

Search & Seizure Survival Guide

Meet your Instructors

At Blue to Gold Law Enforcement Training, we specialize in transforming complex legal principles into actionable knowledge for officers. Our team, including experts who have real-world experience as police officers and district attorneys, brings decades of hands-on experience in both the field and classroom. Our mission is clear: to enhance officer safety and community trust through a deep understanding of case law. Our courses are designed to be engaging and relevant, ensuring officers can confidently apply what they learn in real-world situations. By focusing on critical areas such as search and seizure and the limits of police authority, we aim to minimize legal errors and promote effective, ethical policing. Choose Blue to Gold for training that prepares you to make the right decisions when it counts.

Testimonials

Send a message!

Subscribe to Update

Request Course for In-Person

Request Course for Live Stream

Request Course for On Demand