support@bluetogold.com
or use our live chat
888-579-7796
Customer Service
or use our live chat
Customer Service
RESEARCH
Officers arrested the defendant and seized his car for a narcotics violation in which the car was used. A state law directed any officer making an arrest for a narcotics violation to seize and deliver any vehicle used to store, conceal, transport, sell, or facilitate the possession of narcotics. โSuch vehicle to be held as evidence until a forfeiture has been declared or a release order issued.โ A search of the automobile a week later revealed evidence used in trial against the defendant.
Whether the warrantless search of the defendantโs automobile, seized by the authority of a forfeiture statute, made a week after his arrest, and not incidental thereto, was reasonable by Fourth Amendment standards?
Yes. Law enforcement officers are permitted to search a car that they are going to retain for a significant period of time.
Evidence showed that the car had been used to carry on his narcotics possession and transportation activities. A state statute required police in such circumstances to seize the vehicle and hold it as evidence until forfeiture was declared or a release ordered. A warrantless search of an arrested personโs automobile, made a week after his arrest and not incident to that arrest, is reasonable where the vehicle is seized for forfeiture.
386 U.S. 58, 87 S. Ct. 788 (1967)
ยฉ Blue to Gold, LLC. All rights reserved
