[email protected]
or use our live chat
888-579-7796
Customer Service
or use our live chat
Customer Service
EXCELLENT Based on 387 reviews sean thompson2024-09-06Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Just took the SRO course. What an absolute outstanding training!!! I am not an SRO and have not been one. But as the Captain I need to learn and understand as much as I can. This course is excellent to have a better understanding of the law and the SRO... Keep up the great work B2G!!!! Doug Wallace2024-08-29Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Good information provided on S&S James Scira2024-08-27Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great training. I would recommend Blue to Gold training to members of LE. Nichalas Liddle2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I have had the pleasure of getting to watch some webinars from Blue to Gold and have enjoyed all the insights and knowledge that the instructors have. Good training for all of us in LE careers. Keep on with the good work yโall do. brian kinsley2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great training, refreshers, topic introductions. I love the free webinars! It really helps when budgets are tight. Thank you!! Tim Crouch2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great, free webinars. Thank you. I love the attorney provided content for up to date and accurate information. Anthony Smith2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Awesome stuff!
Gifts & Gears
Mailing Address
Blue to Gold, LLC
12402 N Division St #119
Spokane, WA 99218
RESEARCH
The defendant and co-defendant Colson were indicted for possession of stolen automobiles and parts. They appeared with their attorneys at arraignment and were released on bail. Before trial, Colson and his lawyers met with the police and Colson confessed to his participation with the defendant in the pending charges. He agreed to testify against the defendant and cooperate with the investigation. Colson also consented to having a recording device placed on his telephone to record his conversations with the defendant and to wear a body wire transmitter to record a meeting with the defendant during which he would discuss the pending charges. The defendant made incriminating statements during an encounter with Colson.
Whether the defendantโs Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated by admission at trial of incriminating statements made to a government informant after indictment?
Yes. The defendant has a right to the presence of counsel for any government questioning that occurs after the Sixth Amendment has attached.The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to assistance of counsel. This assistance is not limited to participation in the trial but encompasses all critical stages (court hearings, lineups and government questioning). The right to counsel attaches at or after the time that adversarial judicial proceedings have been initiated. This occurs at the indictment or the filing of an information. This can occur at the initial appearance if the defendant expresses a desire to be represented by counsel. The co-defendantโs participation in the meeting was the โfunctional equivalentโ of interrogation and violates this Sixth Amendment right. However, incriminating statements pertaining to other crimes, as to which the Sixth Amendment right has not yet attached, are admissible at a trial for those offenses.
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to assistance of counsel. This assistance is not limited to participation in the trial but encompasses all critical stages (court hearings, lineups and government questioning). The right to counsel attaches at or after the time that adversarial judicial proceedings have been initiated. This occurs at the indictment or the filing of an information. This can occur at the initial appearance if the defendant expresses a desire to be represented by counsel. The co-defendantโs participation in the meeting was the โfunctional equivalentโ of interrogation and violates this Sixth Amendment right. However, incriminating statements pertaining to other crimes, as to which the Sixth Amendment right has not yet attached, are admissible at a trial for those offenses.
474 U.S. 159, 106 S. Ct. 477 (1985)
ยฉ Blue to Gold, LLC. All rights reserved