[email protected]
or use our live chat
888-579-7796
Customer Service
or use our live chat
Customer Service
EXCELLENT Based on 387 reviews sean thompson2024-09-06Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Just took the SRO course. What an absolute outstanding training!!! I am not an SRO and have not been one. But as the Captain I need to learn and understand as much as I can. This course is excellent to have a better understanding of the law and the SRO... Keep up the great work B2G!!!! Doug Wallace2024-08-29Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Good information provided on S&S James Scira2024-08-27Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great training. I would recommend Blue to Gold training to members of LE. Nichalas Liddle2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I have had the pleasure of getting to watch some webinars from Blue to Gold and have enjoyed all the insights and knowledge that the instructors have. Good training for all of us in LE careers. Keep on with the good work yโall do. brian kinsley2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great training, refreshers, topic introductions. I love the free webinars! It really helps when budgets are tight. Thank you!! Tim Crouch2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great, free webinars. Thank you. I love the attorney provided content for up to date and accurate information. Anthony Smith2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Awesome stuff!
Gifts & Gears
Mailing Address
Blue to Gold, LLC
12402 N Division St #119
Spokane, WA 99218
RESEARCH
The defendant pled guilty to one count of conspiring to distribute five or more kilograms of cocaine. The quantity of drugs involved was crucial, because this amount would be used by the court in sentencing. The defendant reserved the right to contest the drug quantity attributable to her under the conspiracy count. The trial court advised the defendant the drug quantity would be determined at her sentencing hearing. During the sentencing proceeding, the government offered testimony from others involved in the conspiracy to establish both the number of transactions in which the defendant had participated, as well as the amount of cocaine she sold. The defendant did not testify at the sentencing proceedings, relying instead on her attorneyโs attacks on the credibility of the government witnesses. The judge expressly stated that he was drawing an adverse inference from the defendantโs failure to testify at her sentencing hearing.
Whether a defendant waives her privilege against self-incrimination in the sentencing phase of the case by pleading guilty?
No. A defendant who pleads guilty does not waive her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination in the sentencing phase of the case.
Nothing prevents a defendant from relying upon a Fifth Amendment privilege at a sentencing proceeding. โTreating a guilty plea as a waiver of the privilege at sentencing would be a grave encroachment on the rights of defendants.โ Otherwise, the government could compel a defendant to take the witness stand and under questioning, elicit information from the defendant that could contribute to an enhanced sentence. โWhere a sentence has not yet been imposed, a defendant may have a legitimate fear of adverse consequences from further testimony.โ The government retains the burden of presenting facts โrelevant to the crime at the sentencing phase and cannot enlist the defendant in this process at the expense of the self-incrimination privilege.โ By holding her silence against her, the judge impermissibly interfered with the defendantโs exercise of her Fifth Amendment right against compulsory self-incrimination.
526 U.S. 314, 119 S. Ct. 1307 (1999)
ยฉ Blue to Gold, LLC. All rights reserved