support@bluetogold.com
or use our live chat
888-579-7796
Customer Service
or use our live chat
Customer Service
RESEARCH
An officer arrested the defendant in front of the home in which he rented a room and removed him from the immediate area. Several people lived in the home, including Graff. The officers approached Graff, who stated she shared a bedroom with the defendant in the home. The officers obtained Graffโs consent to search the house for money and a gun. The officers found these items in the bedroom shared by Graff and the defendant
Whether Graff had the ability to grant consent to the search?
Yes. If a third party and the defendant have joint authority over the premises, then the third party has the ability to grant consent.
When the prosecution seeks to justify a warrantless search by proof of voluntary consent, it may show that permission was obtained from a third party who possessed common authority over the area or item. Common authority cannot be implied from the mere property interest that a third-party has in the property. The authority that justifies the third-party consent rests on mutual use of the property by persons having joint access or control. Any of the co-inhabitants have the right to permit an inspection and that the others have assumed the risk that any of their co-inhabitants might permit the common area to be searched. But see the limitations imposed by Georgia v. Randolph.
415 U.S. 164, 94 S. Ct. 988 (1974)
ยฉ Blue to Gold, LLC. All rights reserved
