[email protected]
or use our live chat
888-579-7796
Customer Service
or use our live chat
Customer Service
EXCELLENT Based on 387 reviews sean thompson2024-09-06Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Just took the SRO course. What an absolute outstanding training!!! I am not an SRO and have not been one. But as the Captain I need to learn and understand as much as I can. This course is excellent to have a better understanding of the law and the SRO... Keep up the great work B2G!!!! Doug Wallace2024-08-29Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Good information provided on S&S James Scira2024-08-27Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great training. I would recommend Blue to Gold training to members of LE. Nichalas Liddle2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I have had the pleasure of getting to watch some webinars from Blue to Gold and have enjoyed all the insights and knowledge that the instructors have. Good training for all of us in LE careers. Keep on with the good work yโall do. brian kinsley2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great training, refreshers, topic introductions. I love the free webinars! It really helps when budgets are tight. Thank you!! Tim Crouch2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great, free webinars. Thank you. I love the attorney provided content for up to date and accurate information. Anthony Smith2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Awesome stuff!
Gifts & Gears
Mailing Address
Blue to Gold, LLC
12402 N Division St #119
Spokane, WA 99218
RESEARCH
An affidavit for a search warrant described seven different occasions between July 28 and August 30, when a car was driven into the backyard of the defendantโs house. On four occasions the car carried loads of sugar in sixty-pound bags; twice it made two trips loaded with empty tin cans; and once it was observed as being heavily laden. Garry, the carโs owner, and Incardone, a passenger, were seen on several occasions loading the car at the defendantโs house and later unloading apparently full five-gallon cans at Garryโs house. The affidavit went on to state that at about 4 a.m. on August 18, and at about 4 a.m. August 30, โInvestigatorsโ smelled the odor of fermenting mash as they walked along the sidewalk in front of the defendantโs house. On August 18 they heard, โat or about the same time, . . . certain metallic noises.โ On August 30, the day before the warrant was applied for, they heard (as they smelled the mash) โsounds similar to that of a motor or a pump coming from the direction of the defendantโs house.โ The affidavit concluded: โThe foregoing information is based upon personal knowledge and information which has been obtained from Investigators of the Alcohol, Tobacco Tax Division, Internal Revenue Service, who have been assigned to this investigation (underline added).โ
Whether failure to indicate which facts alleged were hearsay and which were within the affiantโs own knowledge destroys the affidavitโs reliability?
No. Courts must determine if probable cause (and an affiantโs reliability) exists through common sense analysis. The failure to indicate which facts alleged were hearsay and which were within the affiantโs own knowledge does not destroy the affidavitโs reliability.
An affidavit which shows probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant is not required to clearly indicate which of the facts alleged are hearsay and which are within the affiantโs own knowledge. However, probable cause cannot be made out by affidavits which are purely conclusory, stating only the affiantโs or an informerโs belief that probable cause exists, without detailing any of the underlying circumstances upon which that belief is based. This belief may be based on hearsay evidence. โAffidavits for search warrantsโฆ must be tested and interpreted by magistrates and courts in a common sense and realistic fashion . . . A grudging or negative attitude by reviewing courts toward warrants will tend to discourage police officers from submitting their evidence to a judicial officer before acting. When a magistrate has found probable cause, the courts should not invalidate the warrant by interpreting the affidavit in a hypertechnical, rather than a common sense, manner.โ
380 U.S. 102, 85 S. Ct. 741 (1965)
ยฉ Blue to Gold, LLC. All rights reserved