[email protected]
or use our live chat
888-579-7796
Customer Service
or use our live chat
Customer Service
EXCELLENT Based on 387 reviews sean thompson2024-09-06Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Just took the SRO course. What an absolute outstanding training!!! I am not an SRO and have not been one. But as the Captain I need to learn and understand as much as I can. This course is excellent to have a better understanding of the law and the SRO... Keep up the great work B2G!!!! Doug Wallace2024-08-29Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Good information provided on S&S James Scira2024-08-27Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great training. I would recommend Blue to Gold training to members of LE. Nichalas Liddle2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I have had the pleasure of getting to watch some webinars from Blue to Gold and have enjoyed all the insights and knowledge that the instructors have. Good training for all of us in LE careers. Keep on with the good work yโall do. brian kinsley2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great training, refreshers, topic introductions. I love the free webinars! It really helps when budgets are tight. Thank you!! Tim Crouch2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great, free webinars. Thank you. I love the attorney provided content for up to date and accurate information. Anthony Smith2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Awesome stuff!
Gifts & Gears
Mailing Address
Blue to Gold, LLC
12402 N Division St #119
Spokane, WA 99218
RESEARCH
A school district was experiencing a dramatic increase in student drug use. In particular, many of the students involved in the schoolโs athletic programs were suspected of using controlled substances. The school district imposed a policy, applicable to all students participating in interscholastic athletics, subjecting them to random drug testing. The student and parents were required to sign a testing consent form before participating in an athletics program. The defendant was denied access to an athletics program as his parents refused consent.
Whether it is reasonable for a school district to require drug testing to participate in athletics programs?
Yes. Student-athletes have a reduced expectation of privacy and the government has a compelling interest in protecting the students from the associated dangers.
The Court has previously dispensed with the governmentโs requirement of obtaining a warrant supported by probable cause in the past when a โspecial needโ to conduct the search exists. The Court has found a โspecial needโ in relation to public schools prior to this case, as well. See New Jersey v. T.L.O.. In this case, the Court found that โ[L]egitimate privacy expectations are even less with regard to student athletes.โ They are subjected to a variety of communal observations and โthey voluntarily subject themselves to a degree of regulationโ by joining the team. The Court balanced the reduced expectation of privacy the student-athletes receive in this environment with the governmentโs compelling interest of protecting โschool athletes, where the risk of immediate physical harm to the drug user or those with whom he is playing his sport is particularly high.โ In doing so, it found the school districtโs requirements reasonable.
515 U.S. 646, 115 S. Ct. 2386 (1995)
ยฉ Blue to Gold, LLC. All rights reserved