support@bluetogold.com

or use our live chat

888-579-7796

Customer Service

LEGAL

RESEARCH

Brendlin v. California

Facts

An officer stopped a car with a temporary license plate even though there was nothing unusual about the circumstances. During the stop, he recognized the passenger in the car as someone who might be a parole violator. The officer asked the passenger to identify himself. After verifying an arrest warrant of the passenger through dispatch, the officer placed him under arrest. A search incident to his arrest yielded evidence of his capability to produce a controlled substance.

Issue

Whether a passenger in a stopped motor vehicle has been โ€œseized?โ€

Held

Yes. The passengers in a motor vehicle are โ€œseizedโ€ just as well as the driver during a routine vehicle stop as they do not feel free to leave the encounter.

Discussion

The Court held that unintended persons can be subjected to a seizure, as happened in this case. As the Fourth Amendment applies to traffic stops, the Court has consistently held that the government seizes drivers and occupants during these encounters. The Court stated โ€œwe have said over and over in dicta that during a traffic stop an officer seizes everyone in the vehicle, not just the driver.โ€ The critical issue is whether a reasonable person would feel free to terminate the encounter. The Court concluded that โ€œany reasonable passenger would have understood the police officers to be exercising control to the point that no one in the car was free to depart without police permission.โ€

Citation

551 U.S. 249, 127 S. Ct. 2400 (2007)

Send a message!

Subscribe to Update