support@bluetogold.com

or use our live chat

888-579-7796

Customer Service

LEGAL

RESEARCH

Bumper v. North Carolina

Facts

Officers went to the house of a grandmother to investigate a rape in which her grandson was suspected. The officers falsely asserted that they had a search warrant and the grandmother consented to a search. The officers did not tell her anything about the crime they were investigating or that her grandson was suspected. The officers found a rifle used in the crime.

Issue

Whether the grandmotherโ€™s consent was voluntarily given if the officers falsely stated that they had a search warrant?

Held

No. Where officers falsely assert that they have a search warrant and then procure โ€œconsent,โ€ the consent is invalid.

Discussion

The government has the burden of proving that consent was freely and voluntarily given. The grandmotherโ€™s consent was not voluntarily given because it had been procured through a wrongful claim of authority. A search cannot be justified as lawful on the basis of consent where that consent has been given only after the official conducting the search has wrongfully asserted that he possessed a warrant. When a law enforcement officer claims authority to search a home pursuant to a warrant, they announce in effect that the occupant has no right to resist the search.

Citation

391 U.S. 543, 89 S. Ct. 1788 (1968)

Send a message!

Subscribe to Update