[email protected]
or use our live chat
888-579-7796
Customer Service
or use our live chat
Customer Service
EXCELLENT Based on 387 reviews sean thompson2024-09-06Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Just took the SRO course. What an absolute outstanding training!!! I am not an SRO and have not been one. But as the Captain I need to learn and understand as much as I can. This course is excellent to have a better understanding of the law and the SRO... Keep up the great work B2G!!!! Doug Wallace2024-08-29Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Good information provided on S&S James Scira2024-08-27Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great training. I would recommend Blue to Gold training to members of LE. Nichalas Liddle2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I have had the pleasure of getting to watch some webinars from Blue to Gold and have enjoyed all the insights and knowledge that the instructors have. Good training for all of us in LE careers. Keep on with the good work yโall do. brian kinsley2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great training, refreshers, topic introductions. I love the free webinars! It really helps when budgets are tight. Thank you!! Tim Crouch2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great, free webinars. Thank you. I love the attorney provided content for up to date and accurate information. Anthony Smith2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Awesome stuff!
Gifts & Gears
Mailing Address
Blue to Gold, LLC
12402 N Division St #119
Spokane, WA 99218
RESEARCH
The IRS seized certain property of a corporation that was determined to be the alter ego of a delinquent taxpayer. Government agents seized automobiles registered in the corporationโs name, acting without warrants, on public streets, parking lots, and other open places. They also went to the defendantโs office, a cottage-type building, and made a warrantless forced entry. Pending further information as to whether the cottage was an office or a residence, the agents made no initial seizures. However, two days later they again entered the cottage without a warrant and seized books, records, and other property.
1. Whether the seizure of the defendantโs property in public was reasonable?
2. Whether the warrantless intrusion into corporate property was reasonable?
1. Yes. The Fourth Amendment was not violated by the warrantless seizures of the corporationโs automobiles, since the seizures took place on public streets, parking lots, or other open places, and did not involve any invasion of privacy.
2. No. The warrantless entry into the corporationโs business office constituted an unconstitutional intrusion into privacy that violated the Fourth Amendment.
The Court held the warrantless automobile seizures, which occurred in public streets, parking lots, or other open areas, involved no invasion of privacy and were constitutional. The property was validly subject to seizure and securing the property in public did not invoke any further privacy interest of the defendantโs. However, the warrantless entry into the privacy of the defendantโs office violated the Fourth Amendment, since โexcept in certain carefully defined classes of cases, a search of private property without proper consent is โunreasonableโ unless it has been authorized by a valid search warrant.โ The Fourth Amendment protects business premises, and corporations enjoy Fourth Amendment protections.
429 U.S. 338, 97 S. Ct. 619 (1977)
ยฉ Blue to Gold, LLC. All rights reserved