support@bluetogold.com

or use our live chat

888-579-7796

Customer Service

LEGAL

RESEARCH

G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United States

Facts

The IRS seized certain property of a corporation that was determined to be the alter ego of a delinquent taxpayer. Government agents seized automobiles registered in the corporationโ€™s name, acting without warrants, on public streets, parking lots, and other open places. They also went to the defendantโ€™s office, a cottage-type building, and made a warrantless forced entry. Pending further information as to whether the cottage was an office or a residence, the agents made no initial seizures. However, two days later they again entered the cottage without a warrant and seized books, records, and other property.

Issue

1. Whether the seizure of the defendantโ€™s property in public was reasonable?
2. Whether the warrantless intrusion into corporate property was reasonable?

Held

1. Yes. The Fourth Amendment was not violated by the warrantless seizures of the corporationโ€™s automobiles, since the seizures took place on public streets, parking lots, or other open places, and did not involve any invasion of privacy.

2. No. The warrantless entry into the corporationโ€™s business office constituted an unconstitutional intrusion into privacy that violated the Fourth Amendment.

Discussion

The Court held the warrantless automobile seizures, which occurred in public streets, parking lots, or other open areas, involved no invasion of privacy and were constitutional. The property was validly subject to seizure and securing the property in public did not invoke any further privacy interest of the defendantโ€™s. However, the warrantless entry into the privacy of the defendantโ€™s office violated the Fourth Amendment, since โ€œexcept in certain carefully defined classes of cases, a search of private property without proper consent is โ€˜unreasonableโ€™ unless it has been authorized by a valid search warrant.โ€ The Fourth Amendment protects business premises, and corporations enjoy Fourth Amendment protections.

Citation

429 U.S. 338, 97 S. Ct. 619 (1977)

Send a message!

Subscribe to Update