[email protected]
or use our live chat
888-579-7796
Customer Service
or use our live chat
Customer Service
EXCELLENT Based on 387 reviews sean thompson2024-09-06Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Just took the SRO course. What an absolute outstanding training!!! I am not an SRO and have not been one. But as the Captain I need to learn and understand as much as I can. This course is excellent to have a better understanding of the law and the SRO... Keep up the great work B2G!!!! Doug Wallace2024-08-29Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Good information provided on S&S James Scira2024-08-27Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great training. I would recommend Blue to Gold training to members of LE. Nichalas Liddle2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I have had the pleasure of getting to watch some webinars from Blue to Gold and have enjoyed all the insights and knowledge that the instructors have. Good training for all of us in LE careers. Keep on with the good work yโall do. brian kinsley2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great training, refreshers, topic introductions. I love the free webinars! It really helps when budgets are tight. Thank you!! Tim Crouch2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great, free webinars. Thank you. I love the attorney provided content for up to date and accurate information. Anthony Smith2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Awesome stuff!
Gifts & Gears
Mailing Address
Blue to Gold, LLC
12402 N Division St #119
Spokane, WA 99218
RESEARCH
A doctor was stabbed to death in his home. His wife was also stabbed by the attacker, but survived. She underwent major surgery to save her life but it was unclear whether she would survive. The officers found evidence at the crime scene that led them to the defendant, who was arrested the day after the assault. The next day, the officers arranged to have the defendant brought to the injured womanโs hospital room to determine if she could identify the defendant as the murderer. During this identification process, the defendant was handcuffed to one of the five officers accompanying him, and was the only African-American in the room. The defendant was also required to say some words for the purpose of voice identification. The victim identified the defendant as the murderer.
Whether the identification procedures utilized by the officers was so unnecessarily suggestive so as to violate the defendantโs due process rights?
No. Judged by the โtotality of the circumstances,โ the identification procedures were necessary to secure significant information.
โThe practice of showing suspects singly to persons for the purpose of identification, and not as part of a lineup, has been widely condemned.โ Nonetheless, whether identification procedures constitute a due process violation requires the Court to look to the โtotality of the circumstancesโ surrounding the identification. In this case, it was evident that the procedures utilized by the police were necessary. The victim was the only person who could either identify the defendant or exonerate him for the crime. โHer words, and only her words, could have resulted in freedom for the defendant. The hospital was not far from the courthouse and jail. No one knew how long the victim might live. Faced with the responsibility of identifying the attacker, with the need for immediate action and with the knowledge that the victim could not visit the jail, the officers followed the only feasible procedure and took the defendant to the hospital room.โ
388 U.S. 293, 87 S. Ct. 1967 (1967)
ยฉ Blue to Gold, LLC. All rights reserved