[email protected]
or use our live chat
888-579-7796
Customer Service
or use our live chat
Customer Service
EXCELLENT Based on 387 reviews sean thompson2024-09-06Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Just took the SRO course. What an absolute outstanding training!!! I am not an SRO and have not been one. But as the Captain I need to learn and understand as much as I can. This course is excellent to have a better understanding of the law and the SRO... Keep up the great work B2G!!!! Doug Wallace2024-08-29Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Good information provided on S&S James Scira2024-08-27Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great training. I would recommend Blue to Gold training to members of LE. Nichalas Liddle2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I have had the pleasure of getting to watch some webinars from Blue to Gold and have enjoyed all the insights and knowledge that the instructors have. Good training for all of us in LE careers. Keep on with the good work yโall do. brian kinsley2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great training, refreshers, topic introductions. I love the free webinars! It really helps when budgets are tight. Thank you!! Tim Crouch2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great, free webinars. Thank you. I love the attorney provided content for up to date and accurate information. Anthony Smith2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Awesome stuff!
Gifts & Gears
Mailing Address
Blue to Gold, LLC
12402 N Division St #119
Spokane, WA 99218
RESEARCH
During the defendantโs tenure as a law partner in Bellis, Kolsby & Wolf, the partnershipโs financial records were maintained in his office. After the partnership dissolved, the defendant left to join another law firm. The partnership records remained in the partnershipโs previous location for approximately three years. Later, the defendantโs secretary, acting at the defendantโs request, removed the records and brought them to his new office. Approximately two months later, the defendant was subpoenaed by a grand jury and ordered to appear and testify and to bring with him โall partnership records currently in your possession for the partnership of Bellis, Kolsby & Wolf for the years 1968 and 1969.โ The defendant refused to produce the partnershipโs records, claiming his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
Whether a defendant who holds partnership records in a representative capacity has a Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination to avoid producing those partnership records, where the records might incriminate him personally?
No. The self-incrimination clause is a personal right, not one belonging to an artificial entity such as a partnership.
โIt has long been established that the Fifth Amendment privilege against compulsory selfincrimination protects an individual from compelled production of his personal papers and effects as well as compelled oral testimony.โ This protection may extend to the business records of a sole proprietor or sole practitioner. However, the Fifth Amendment right against compulsory self-incrimination is a purely private right that cannot be invoked by any artificial entity, such as a corporation or a partnership. โIt follows that an individual acting in his official capacity on behalf of the organization may likewise not take advantage of his personal privilege.โ Instead, โthe papers and effects which the privilege protects must be the private property of the person claiming the privilege, or at least in his possession in a purely personal capacity.โ This rule applies even where the records sought might personally incriminate the individual who holds them provided that the records sought are those of the organization and not the individual. Here, it was clear, based on the nature of the records sought, that they constituted records of the partnership, not the personal records of the defendant. The defendant had no ownership rights in these records, and could not use the records for anything other than partnership purposes.
417 U.S. 85, 94 S. Ct. 2179 (1974)
ยฉ Blue to Gold, LLC. All rights reserved