[email protected]
or use our live chat
888-579-7796
Customer Service
or use our live chat
Customer Service
EXCELLENT Based on 387 reviews sean thompson2024-09-06Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Just took the SRO course. What an absolute outstanding training!!! I am not an SRO and have not been one. But as the Captain I need to learn and understand as much as I can. This course is excellent to have a better understanding of the law and the SRO... Keep up the great work B2G!!!! Doug Wallace2024-08-29Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Good information provided on S&S James Scira2024-08-27Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great training. I would recommend Blue to Gold training to members of LE. Nichalas Liddle2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I have had the pleasure of getting to watch some webinars from Blue to Gold and have enjoyed all the insights and knowledge that the instructors have. Good training for all of us in LE careers. Keep on with the good work yโall do. brian kinsley2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great training, refreshers, topic introductions. I love the free webinars! It really helps when budgets are tight. Thank you!! Tim Crouch2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great, free webinars. Thank you. I love the attorney provided content for up to date and accurate information. Anthony Smith2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Awesome stuff!
Gifts & Gears
Mailing Address
Blue to Gold, LLC
12402 N Division St #119
Spokane, WA 99218
RESEARCH
The defendants were arrested and charged with felonies based on a prosecutorโs charging document. At that time, the state only required indictments for capital offenses. State case law held that the filing of an information foreclosed the defendantโs right to have a judge determine whether probable cause existed for the arrest.
Whether a person arrested and held for trial under an information is constitutionally entitled to a judicial determination of probable cause for pretrial restraint of liberty?
Yes. The Fourth Amendment demands a judicial review of an arrest before an โextended restraint of libertyโ is imposed.
The Court noted that in many instances, the government is permitted to act without the review of a judicial authority. The Court stated that โa policemanโs on-the-scene assessment of probable cause provides legal justification for arresting a person suspected of crime, and for a brief period of detention to take the administrative steps incident to arrest. Once the suspect is in custody, however, the reasons that justify dispensing with the magistrateโs neutral judgment evaporate.โ At some point, the governmentโs need to secure the defendant subsides and โthe suspectโs need for a neutral determination of probable cause increases significantly.โ Based on these factors the Court held that โthe Fourth Amendment requires a judicial determination of probable cause as a prerequisite to extended restraint of liberty following arrest.โ The fact that the prosecutor found substantial evidence to warrant a prosecution does not afford the citizen the protections contemplated in the Fourth Amendment.
420 U.S. 103, 95 S. Ct. 854 (1975)
ยฉ Blue to Gold, LLC. All rights reserved