[email protected]
or use our live chat
888-579-7796
Customer Service
or use our live chat
Customer Service
EXCELLENT Based on 387 reviews sean thompson2024-09-06Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Just took the SRO course. What an absolute outstanding training!!! I am not an SRO and have not been one. But as the Captain I need to learn and understand as much as I can. This course is excellent to have a better understanding of the law and the SRO... Keep up the great work B2G!!!! Doug Wallace2024-08-29Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Good information provided on S&S James Scira2024-08-27Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great training. I would recommend Blue to Gold training to members of LE. Nichalas Liddle2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I have had the pleasure of getting to watch some webinars from Blue to Gold and have enjoyed all the insights and knowledge that the instructors have. Good training for all of us in LE careers. Keep on with the good work yโall do. brian kinsley2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great training, refreshers, topic introductions. I love the free webinars! It really helps when budgets are tight. Thank you!! Tim Crouch2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great, free webinars. Thank you. I love the attorney provided content for up to date and accurate information. Anthony Smith2024-08-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Awesome stuff!
Gifts & Gears
Mailing Address
Blue to Gold, LLC
12402 N Division St #119
Spokane, WA 99218
RESEARCH
The defendant owned several sole proprietorships. During a grand jury investigation of corruption, the grand jury served subpoenas on the defendant, seeking the production of voluntarily prepared business records of the sole proprietorships. The defendant moved to quash the subpoenas on two grounds. First, he claimed that the subpoenaed records were privileged under the Fifth Amendment. Second, he claimed that the act of producing the requested documents was privileged under the Fifth Amendment.
1. Whether voluntarily created business records are protected by the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination?
2. Whether the act of compelling the production of the requested business records is protected by the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination?
1. No. Business records that are voluntarily created are not protected by the Fifth Amendment privilege against self- incrimination as they were not compelled in their creation.
2. Yes. The act of compelling the production of requested business records (by subpoena) is protected by the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
The Fifth Amendment protects the defendant only from compelled self-incrimination. However, โwhere the preparation of business records is voluntary, no compulsion is present.โ In other words, โif the party asserting the Fifth Amendment privilege has voluntarily compiled the document, no compulsion is present and the contents of the document are not privileged.โ
While the contents of the subpoenaed business records are not privileged under the Fifth Amendment, the act of producing the records is privileged. By producing the documents requested in the subpoena, the defendant is admitting the documentโs existence, that the defendant has possession or control over the document, and that the documents being turned over are authentic. These acts โmay have testimonial aspects and an incriminating effect.โ However, the government could compel the defendant to produce the documents by providing him with โuseโ immunity, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ยงยง 6002-6003, or secure them through the use of a search warrant.
465 U.S. 605, 104 S. Ct. 1237 (1984)
ยฉ Blue to Gold, LLC. All rights reserved