support@bluetogold.com

or use our live chat

888-579-7796

Customer Service

LEGAL

RESEARCH

Oliver v. United States

Facts

Narcotic agents, acting on a report that marijuana was being grown on the defendantโ€™s farm, went there to investigate. They drove past the defendantโ€™s house to a locked gate with a โ€œno trespassingโ€ sign, but with a footpath around the gate on one side. The agents walked around the gate and along the footpath and found a field of marijuana over a mile from the defendantโ€™s house.

Issue

Whether the officersโ€™ observations were made from the open field?

Held

Yes. The officersโ€™ observations were made from an area in which the defendant did not have the ability to challenge.

Discussion

Steps taken to protect privacy, such as planting the marijuana on secluded land and erecting fences and โ€œNo Trespassingโ€ signs around the property, do not necessarily establish an expectation of privacy in an open field. Open fields do not provide the setting for those intimate activities that the Fourth Amendment is intended to shelter from government intrusion or surveillance.

Citation

466 U.S. 170, 104 S. Ct. 1735 (1984)

Send a message!

Subscribe to Update