Can You Ignore Your Federal Circuit Court’s Rulings?

Anthony Bandiero

Attorney - Senior Legal Instructor

Share:

There is some truth to what the old-timers who are long in the tooth say: yeah, we can just ignore that, that’s federal, we’re in state, we don’t have to listen to it.

That is true. And the reason it’s true is that state courts have their own sovereignty. They have their own authority to interpret the Fourth Amendment as they see it.

The California Supreme Court can absolutely disagree with the Ninth Circuit. If they wanted to take up a similar case, they could say no, we can point guns at people as a matter of routine during these stolen car stops.

The problem, though, is why would you do that?

Where it costs you money

Here’s the problem.

A person in your city gets pulled over at gunpoint. Your officers are not articulating any danger, the kind of articulation the Ninth Circuit wants to see.

Your driver is not going to run to the state courts to sue you. They’re going to run to federal court, because they know they have a case that’s exactly on point saying you can’t do it.

So they’re going to get paid.

You will write checks, even while your officers are saying hey, don’t worry about it, we have our own sovereignty, where’s the California state court case that says we can’t do that?

Okay, fine. You’re right. But the problem is you’re going to pay money, because it’s clearly established.

That’s the qualified immunity trap

There it is. That second part of qualified immunity: was it clearly established?

And there, the Ninth Circuit is the one that establishes it.

You don’t get to judge shop. The plaintiff gets to court shop.

If I’m a plaintiff’s attorney, and I’m in the business of suing cops, I’m not going to go to state court, because there’s no case on it there. I’m going to federal court. And that’s all I need.

Does that make sense?

That’s the problem with ignoring the Ninth Circuit. You do it at your own risk.

Related from Blue to Gold

This article is an edited transcript of Roadside Chat Ep. #734. It is legal training, not legal advice. Check your state law and your agency policy, because both can be more restrictive than the Fourth Amendment.

Related Training

Case Law for Command Staff and Supervisors is a leadership-level course designed to equip law enforcement supervisors with a strong command of Fourth Amendment case law. When critical incidents unfold, command staff must provide immediate, legally sound guidance. This course delivers the essential knowledge needed to make defensible decisions, reduce agency liability, and support officers in the field. Through clear instruction and real-world examples, students will learn how to confidently resolve legal questions surrounding searches and seizures. Includes a completion certificate and the Search & Seizure Survival Guide for ongoing legal reference.

 

More Posts

Are Orders to Detain and Transport a Suspect for an Interview Lawful?

An officer in Missouri asked about a common practice in Kansas City, where prosecutors issue a stop order or person of interest order and the person is then handcuffed and transported to the station for a formal interview. Anthony walks through why that is fine if the order rests on probable cause, and why it is a serious problem if it does not.

Read More »

Can You Arrest a Robbery Suspect Who Tells You to Leave His Curtilage?

Officers had probable cause for a strong armed robbery, no arrest warrant, and a suspect on his own front porch telling them at least five times to leave. Anthony walks through the Fourth Amendment rules of engagement for curtilage, why a felony by itself is not exigency, and why the hardest skill in police work is recognizing when you have been legally beat.

Read More »

Send Us A Message

0
    0
    Your Cart